Showing posts with label England. Show all posts
Showing posts with label England. Show all posts

Thursday, July 22, 2010

Petition in support of Michael Savage.

Jumping in Pools was just one of a handful of American Blogs to cover the United Kingdom's list of banned individuals, which included nazis murderers, and Michael Savage: who is a Radio Talk Show Host out of San Francisco, California, and who was apparently targeted by Jacqui Smith (Britain's former Home Secretary) for his Conservative views.

We (those who cared and followed the story) expected that when David Cameron and the Conservative Party regained control of England that Mr.Savage's good name would be removed from that list of murderers and anti-semites. However, Prime Minister Cameron has reaffirmed the English ban of Mr.Savage, who still isn't allowed into the Country of the Magna Carta.

Thus, I feel compelled to launch a petition in support of Michael Savage, a man of many opinions and thoughts, but most importanty - one who believes in Freedom, and who doesn't belong on a list of thugs, criminals, and murderers banned from Britain; America's greatest ally.

http://www.petitiononline.com/savage11/petition.html

"We the people of the United States of America, who share a sacred bond with the English citizenry through our common friendship and common values, do call upon the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom's recently formed coalition government to end the insulting and immoral act of banning American Talk Show Host Michael Savage from entering your Nation."

Please sign.


Consider advertising on our site!

Sunday, May 30, 2010

The Two-Party system is faltering in England.

The financial situation in England is horrific, their English population is aging, and Islamists are slowly gaining control. However, there might be one threat greater than all three of the before mentioned combined: The death of England's Two-Party system.

You don't have to believe me, but I would ask that you read into these electoral results for the last four Parliamentary elections:

1997 - Major Two Parties = 73.9% of the vote.

Labour - 418 seats - 43.2% of the vote.
Conservative - 165 seats - 30.7% of the vote.
Liberal Dems - 46 seats - 16.8% of the vote.
Other - 30 seats - 9.3% of the vote.

2001 - Major Two Parties = 72.4% of the vote.

Labour - 413 seats - 40.7% of the vote.
Conservative - 166 seats - 31.7% of the vote.
Liberal Dems - 52 seats - 18.2% of the vote.
Other - 28 seats - 9.3% of the vote.

2005 - Major Two Parties = 67.6% of the vote.

Labour - 356 seats - 35.2% of the vote.
Conservative - 198 seats - 32.4% of the vote.
Liberal Dems - 62 seats - 22.0% of the vote.
Other - 31 seats - 10.6% of the vote.

2010 - Major Two Parties = 65.1% of the vote.

Conservative - 306 seats - 36.1% of the vote.
Labour - 258 seats - 29.0% of the vote
Liberal Dems - 57 seats - 23.0% of the vote.
Other - 29 seats - 11.9% of the vote.

What do the above mentioned electoral results tell you?

1. England is evolving into a Three-Party political system; which will result in more coalition governments, unstable governance, and ultimate political power for the Liberal Democrats & Nick Clegg (at least for the moment).

2. Other political parties (most of which are sectionalist parties; Scottish National Party, Sinn Fein, etc.) are increasing their "vote percentages" across Great Britain, which one day could result in a Islamic Party that carries significant political capital.

3. The kingmakers of government could soon be controlled by either rightwing or leftwing loons, unless the Major Two Parties neutralize them through (rightwing or leftwing) non-government coalitions, or dissolve the fringe political parties into their mainstream parties.

What can Conservatives do to capitalize from this Two-Party system downfall?

1. Govern as promised for the next four or five years; win back the trust of English voters.

2. Deal with Britain's awful economic problems first; solve what needs to be solved.

3. Dissolve the UK Independence Party into their own; Right-Of-Center unity.

I fear for the future of Great Britain; but I have great hope in the current Prime Minister and in British Conservatives that a solution to the Nation's declining Two-Party system can be resolved without significant damage.

Bookmark our site!Subscribe

Bookmark and Share
Consider advertising on our site!

Friday, May 7, 2010

"Save our Pubs" campaign works in England.



Andrew Griffiths was the Conservative candidate for Parliament in Burton, and according to a recent "tweet" from the United Kingdom Conservative Party twitter account, Mr.Griffiths was running on a "Save our Pubs" campaign, and he still won the election. In fact, Mr.Griffiths won with 44.5% of the vote, a 7.2% increase for the Conservative Party in Burton.

Andrew Griffiths won in a 12 year dominated Labour district, with 44.5% of the vote, due in part for running a campaign based on beer. I'm not kidding, this issue was substantial in his election, even his campaign website has Supporting the Brewing Industry number two on his issues page, I just can't believe it.



Apparently 33% of the price of every pint of beer goes towards taxation in Britain, forcing local Pubs to close on a regular basis, while punishing casual beer drinkers for the problems of hostile alcoholics. No wonder Mr.Griffiths ran and won his campaign on beer, perhaps candidates should consider a similar campaign on tobacco to win elections in America.

If John McCain was running for Prime Minister in England: With his wife has a well known Beer Distributor owner, he would have won without a fight. God Bless the voters in the Burton district and God Save the Pubs!

Hat Tip to Professor Jacobson

To be serious for a moment: Congratulations to Mr.Griffith for winning his election in Burton, for hopefully helping to elect David Cameron as Prime Minister and for helping to restore Conservatism in the United Kingdom, one Pint and one Pub at a time.

Bookmark our site!Subscribe
Bookmark and Share
Consider advertising on our site!

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

Britain Expelling Israeli Diplomat

Some interesting news out of the United Kingdom. Apparently Great Britain has decided to expel an Israeli diplomat over the accused killing of Hamas members in Dubai. This comes after a British judge indicted former Israeli Cabinet Minister Tzipi Livni on 'war crimes.'

So this news looks like it's not major, but it's certainly an annoyance to Israel who was just defending its people and interests (and that of the United States, I might add) by blowing away some Hamas scumbags.

The Israeli ambassador to London, Ron Prosor, was summoned to the U.K. Foreign Office in February to discuss the charges, but he flatly denied there was any "additional information" to give.

Sky News' foreign affairs editor Tim Marshall said, "The (U.K.) government believes they have compelling evidence that those passports were cloned, probably by some arm of the Israeli state."



Bookmark our site!
Subscribe
Bookmark and Share
Consider advertising on our site!

Wednesday, May 6, 2009

England bans USA Conservatism

Unlike the rest of the world, the United States via the first amendment protects the freedom of speech, whether it be private or political related. This was especially put in place for political reasons so dissent could not be banned or not subject to penalty, however many President's during a time of war (never George W. Bush) have shut down all dissent. Which I have never supported, because then you become like those you have sworn to fight.

For decades, radio was just music, because talk radio did not exist, as it does today. The reasons is because of the fairness doctrine, which virtually made it illegal for a station to air one opinion only, usually to an area where that opinion is highest, thus going against the freedom of speech and the freedom of press. President Reagan changed that in the late 1980's, which gave talk radio new standing in the political spectrum, and has led to a Conservative medium - in a liberally biased media world.

If you follow Conservative talk radio as I do, you have heard of the big names ; Rush Limbaugh, Sena Hannity, Glenn Beck, Michael Savage, Mark Levine, etc. Then you also know, out of the entire bunch of great talkers, that Michael Savage is not afraid to voice his opinion. Critics have launched attack after attack on Savage, each one has failed just like the one before it. Save is brutal honest truth telling Conservatives, he cares little of what anyone thinks of his opinion, that's why his audience keeps coming back.

Lets ask this question now, a Conservative talk show hosts giving his opinion against a jihadist planning attacks/calling for attacks in America & England, who is more of a threat to America, hell even England? According to England, that would be Conservative talk show host Michael Savage, who has never advocated for violence, overthrow of government, or any other act of disobedience against the law, has been banned from England.

England has called Savage an extremist, how about Rev. Wright who has advocated anti-American views for 20 years, except Wright does not fit into the Department of Homeland Security's right wing extremism report.

What will the price of limiting political/religious free speech have on America?

In conclusion, England has banned a Conservative because of his political beliefs & opinions, yet Americans have remained silent to attempts to regulate/limit political free speech on talk radio and on the Internet, lets also remind folks that so called "hate crimes" legislation going through Congress currently, we pretty much ban the laws of God of ever being taught.

Our first amendment, makes or breaks the Constitution & America, which side are you on?


Consider advertising on our site!
Also, if you need to search anything on Google, please use the bar below: