Showing posts with label Banned. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Banned. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

Poll: Should Joe Be Kicked Off the Blog?

Over the last several months, Joe C., one of our original cast, was affronted all of us by not posting, despite our many pleas. We've tried everything, including giving his money to screaming in his face.

Now is the reckoning.

This vote will be binding if Joe will not write several article in the next seven days.




Remember to bookmark our site!
Consider advertising on our site!
Also, if you need to search anything on Google, please use the bar below:

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

Interesting: Church of Scientology Could be Banned from France Because of "Organized Fraud"

This is a very interesting story from Yahoo! News about the Church of Scientology possibly being banned in France because they think it is a religious fraud:

PARIS (AFP) – The Church of Scientology and six of its French leaders went on trial on Monday on charges of organised fraud that could lead to an outright ban on the organisation in France.

Known for its Hollywood celebrity followers Tom Cruise and John Travolta, the group is in the dock in Paris for the second time in six years, although French courts have prosecuted several individual Scientologists since 1978.

The court is hearing a complaint from two women, one of whom alleges she was manipulated into handing over 20,000 euros (28,000 dollars) for costly Scientology products, such as an "electrometer" to measure mental energy.

She says she was approached in a Paris street by a Scientologist in late 1998 who offered a free personality test, at a time when she was feeling psychologically fragile.

After being told that her test results were poor, the woman was sold a series of life-improvement courses, vitamins and other products that she could ill afford, landing her in debt.

The second complainant alleges she was forced by her Scientologist employer to undergo testing and enroll in courses in 1998. When she resisted, she was fired.

Originally, there were four complainants, but two have since withdrawn.

The plaintiffs' lawyers argue that Scientology resorts to harassment and pressure to rein in victims who show signs of vulnerability.

The Scientology Celebrity Centre in Paris, its director Alain Rosenberg and five other top officials are accused of preying on fragile followers "with the goal of seizing their fortune by exerting a psychological hold."

Although seven people were charged, one defendant has since died.

The group's spokeswoman in France rejected the accusations, insisting that Scientology was a legitimate religion whose members faced persecution.

"This is a trial for heresy," said Daniele Gounord, adding that the Church was being "hounded" in French courts because it advocated new ideas.

The court's presiding judge Sophie-Helene Chateau insisted that "it is not up to the courts to decide on an issue of society," referring to the movement's status in France, where officials treat it as a sect.

Some of the Scientologists are also charged with illegally supplying pharmaceutical products after plaintiffs said they were given vitamins and concoctions to improve their mental state.

If convicted of organised fraud as a group, the defendants face a maximum sentence of seven years in jail and a fine of one million euros (1.4 million dollars).

Should French prosecutors win a conviction, the movement's French structures, the Scientology Celebrity Centre and an associated bookshop in Paris, could be shut down for failing to meet their responsibilities as legal entities.

However, even if the court rules in favour of the plaintiffs and decides to impose a ban, the Church of Scientology has the right to appeal and the legal wrangling could continue for years.

Founded in the United States in 1954 by science-fiction writer L. Ron Hubbard, the Church of Scientology is officially recognised as a religion there for tax purposes.

Politicians in some European countries including France, Germany, Greece and Russia have accused the movement of exploiting its members financially.

There are believed to be several thousand Scientology followers in France -- the movement claims 45,000 among a worldwide membership of 12 million -- but the state does not recognise it as a religion.

The trial is scheduled to continue until June 17 and a ruling is not expected until some time later.

Now, although Scientology is widely considered by people a freaky religion in the United States (and this blogger is one of them), what does this say about the freedom of religion in France? Seriously, though it is weird, any religion cannot be banned so long as it isn't violent or breaks the law. Scientology, therefore, cannot be banned here in the United States. So, France, is freedom of religion being swept away, or is your potential banishment of Scientology justified? I suppose we shall see.

Remember to bookmark our site!
Consider advertising on our site!
Also, if you need to search anything on Google, please use the bar below:

Wednesday, May 6, 2009

Michael Savage Blacklisted from Britain

According to Yahoo! News, the government of Britain recently released a report in which it blacklists several "radicals." These crazies include people from Hamas, Jewish extremists...and popular talk show host Michael Savage.

According to the Home Secretary of Britain, Jacqui Smith, "If you can't live by the rules that we live by... we should exclude you from this country and, what's more, now we will make public those people that we have excluded."

I will be the first to say that I love Great Britain. They are a symbol of rights and freedom throughout the world and one of the United States' greatest ally. But what can you say when they are banning people from their country because of their opinions? You can't truly say anything.

Free speech, something that apparently cannot cross the Atlantic. But then again, we must be watchful against the so-called "Fairness Doctrine," which will limit our freedom. We must be vigilant not to lose our own free speech.


Consider advertising on our site!
Also, if you need to search anything on Google, please use the bar below:

Monday, May 4, 2009

Obama: Lesser Political Parties "Unnecessary"

Richard Edelman
Conservative News and Reporting
"News for the rest of us"


WASHINGTON- In what experts are calling a "ground-breaking move," President Obama Sunday called "lesser" political parties unnecessary, hinting that he may consider outlawing them.

"There can only be so many points of views in our country," the President said at a press conference on Sunday. "It is clear that parties such as the Socialist Party, Workers Party, or Libertarian Party will never represent a meaningful percent of the American public. They simply cannot contribute to the electoral process.

"I hate to say it, but it may be easier and cheaper to remove these parties," President Obama continued. "In a time of recession, we can benefit two-fold from removing these smaller parties. One, by ending these entities, it will be much cheaper to run elections and count votes. Two, we need political unity in a time like this, and lesser parties, such as the Constitution Party, only serve as divisive.

"I will never say that we should get rid of these parties," Obama said, "I just feel the need to outline the benefits that are possible."

The President's speech, which has largely been ignored by the media, has still been met with massive resistance. "I can't believe what he is alluding to," said Henry Epstike, a member of the Green Party. "To say that we must silence dissent by getting rid of other parties is ridiculous."

Patricia Chires, an Independent, stated her outrage, stating, "What, just because I think that machine politics are ruining the two-party system, I am wrong? I don't like the Democrat or Republican party because they don't listen to their roots. But am I suppose to join them because the President demands it? I don't think so."

Even with many lesser party members stating their disapproval with the President's proposal, he still plans to make a speech to Congress within the next month.

"It is something we must deal with," the President said. "We cannot have dissenters in the government."



If you need to search anything on Google, please use the bar below: