I'm smarter than Eric Holder.

It's official: I'm smarter than the United States Attorney General, Eric Holder. Why? Well, I sat down this morning, and I read all 16 pages of that difficult Arizona Immigration law, and I also understood the legislation, unlike our Attorney General, who hasn't read the Immigration law, but is threatening a federal lawsuit over the Immigration law, which he hasn't read.

Please imagine our first Attorney General, Edmund Randolph, not reading the legislation he was supposed to uphold, defend or file lawsuit over. I can't imagine that, because our Founder Father culture of ideals, actually appreciated the law, and they also enjoyed a good afternoon of reading, unlike Eric Holder.

So what does the legislation say?

1. Federal Law will be adopted on a State level, and followed to the letter. Arizona is enforcing the laws that the Federal government has ignored. That's all this legislation is about.

2. Police Officers and District Attorneys cannot pursue a case or a lead based on race. Besides from the legislative protections, a good portion of Arizona law enforcement personal are born Hispanic-Americans, are you really going to accuse them of race based hate crimes?

3. All money received from illegal aliens, traffickers and employers, will go towards a general fund to combat gang violence and to relieve the local financial burden of housing illegal aliens.

That's about it. I didn't read one line about gutting illegal aliens, enforcing a race based night watchman at every building, or authorizing Arizona law enforcement to goosestep at every traffic stop involving illegal aliens. Than again I'm not Eric Holder, I don't how to file lawsuits without first reading the law.

I'm smarter than Eric Holder and you can be too; Just google "SB 1070" and Arizona's tough-on-illegal alien legislation will be there for all to read, including Eric Holder, if he ever takes his head out of Barack Obama's ass.

Bookmark our site!

Consider advertising on our site!

US Considering Dropping Charges Against bin Laden

Conservative News and Reporting
"News for the Rest of Us."
Geoffrey Likeson

According to sources in the Justice Department, the Obama Administration is pushing for the reversal of charges levied against purported al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden. Bin Laden is under indictment from U.S. courts for his roles in the bombings of American embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998, as well as the September 11, 2001 attacks.

This move comes as new Attorney General Eric Holder is promising a more "fair and open" Justice Department. Holder is the first African-American Attorney General and is a close confidant of the President.

According to a draft report circulating at the DOJ, Holder has asked that the charges against bin Laden and deputy Ayman al-Zawahiri be "suspended" until the time of their capture or death. Effectively, this would drop all charges against the two.

It is unknown if the President himself has pushed for these changes, but it is noted that such a public reversal could not happen without the White House's explicit approval.

The cause for this change of policy is not clear, but aligns closely with the changes that the Obama Administration has taken to reverse Bush-era "mistakes." It is speculated that the changes could be used to lessen international disapproval of American actions in Afghanistan. In addition, this could lead to a permanent suspension of the charges if bin Laden were to promise not to engage in terrorism.

It has been argued that if the charges are dropped against the al Qaeda members, then the United States technically has no right to apprehend or harm the two if they were ever found. James Fortright, a Constitutional scholar at George Washington University states that as long as there is no warrant for an arrest, the government is almost powerless.

"Without a warrant, you have to catch them in the act." Fortright stated in an email interview, "This would mean that if we located them, we could not touch them until a terrorist attack was already underway."

These changes are under the jurisdiction of the White House once approved by the Attorney General. When these actions will take place is unknown, but will likely be done by the end of the year.

Also, if you need to search anything on Google, please use the bar below:

No Eric Holder.

Eric Holder for Attorney General?

I don't think so.

This man has a miserable past, in the Clinton administration he was a key player in the pardon of Marc Rich, and was severely pro-gun control during those years, since he has supported every single anti-second amendment, anti-freedom, anti-Constitution, pro-gun control measure across the United States of America, and even wrote a letter to the United States Supreme Court stating that we as United States residents have no right to own guns, only state/federal militas do, if I may :

"a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

The Constitution clearly states that we as the people of the United States of America have the right to own firearms, and that this given right shall not be taken away from us.

Eric Holder is bad for this country, bad for our Constitution, and bad for gun owners.

As a member of the National Rifle Association, I hope the United States Senate blocks his nomination, and that the NRA fight this nomination to the end, we cannot let this man become Attorney General!


Also, if you need to search anything on Google, please use the bar below: