I'm smarter than Eric Holder.

It's official: I'm smarter than the United States Attorney General, Eric Holder. Why? Well, I sat down this morning, and I read all 16 pages of that difficult Arizona Immigration law, and I also understood the legislation, unlike our Attorney General, who hasn't read the Immigration law, but is threatening a federal lawsuit over the Immigration law, which he hasn't read.

Please imagine our first Attorney General, Edmund Randolph, not reading the legislation he was supposed to uphold, defend or file lawsuit over. I can't imagine that, because our Founder Father culture of ideals, actually appreciated the law, and they also enjoyed a good afternoon of reading, unlike Eric Holder.

So what does the legislation say?

1. Federal Law will be adopted on a State level, and followed to the letter. Arizona is enforcing the laws that the Federal government has ignored. That's all this legislation is about.

2. Police Officers and District Attorneys cannot pursue a case or a lead based on race. Besides from the legislative protections, a good portion of Arizona law enforcement personal are born Hispanic-Americans, are you really going to accuse them of race based hate crimes?

3. All money received from illegal aliens, traffickers and employers, will go towards a general fund to combat gang violence and to relieve the local financial burden of housing illegal aliens.

That's about it. I didn't read one line about gutting illegal aliens, enforcing a race based night watchman at every building, or authorizing Arizona law enforcement to goosestep at every traffic stop involving illegal aliens. Than again I'm not Eric Holder, I don't how to file lawsuits without first reading the law.

I'm smarter than Eric Holder and you can be too; Just google "SB 1070" and Arizona's tough-on-illegal alien legislation will be there for all to read, including Eric Holder, if he ever takes his head out of Barack Obama's ass.

Bookmark our site!

Consider advertising on our site!

Times Square Bomber Captured. Thanks, Patriot Act!

I realize that the Patriot Act was indeed written to guarantee a Nazi-esque police state in which anti-war protesters were beaten and environmental activists executed, but it appears that one of its less-horrible means has captured one of the men responsible for Saturday's bombing attempt.

The vehicle identification number had been removed from the bomb-laden 1993 Nissan Pathfinder left in Times Square. But investigators were able to lift it from a second location on the vehicle, and used that to track down a Connecticut man who said he had sold the Pathfinder for cash about three weeks ago.

The man had offered the vehicle on Craigslist, and FBI agents were able to recover the number from a disposable cellphone that had been used by the buyer.

Any wonder that President Obama has embraced the Patriot Act? It may have just saved his presidency.

So let's all say it together:

Thanks, President Bush.

Bookmark our site!

Consider advertising on our site!

Holder Still Won't Give Up on NYC Trials for KSM

Despite massive bipartisan outrage over the proposed trial of Khalid Sheik Mohammed, the mastermind of the September 11, 2001 atrocities, Attorney General Eric Holder still is considering holding his trial in New York City. This plan was berated by New York's Independent Mayor Michael Bloomberg as well as NY Democratic Senator Kirsten Gillebrand. GOP reactions to the plan have been decidedly negative.

But of course Holder still doesn't get it:

Still, in his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Mr. Holder said the administration was taking “into consideration the concerns that have been raised by local officials, and by the community in New York City,” about the cost and disruptiveness of security arrangements that would be needed if the case were to be prosecuted in a Manhattan courtroom. And he did not rule out moving the case to a military commission.

Wow.

Bookmark our site!

Consider advertising on our site!

Obama's Changing the Subject Threatens American Unity

President Barack Obama has taken a beating politically over the last month. Controversy over the handling of the Professor Gates situation, coupled with the public relations fiasco relating to the health care reform bill has sunk his poll numbers. Zogby even had the President at 45% last week.

And so with the primary messages not working, it appears that the White House is trying to change the message. The President and the First Family are on vacation, so Obama will be out of the spotlight. So that's why Eric Holder is replacing his image with... George W. Bush.

That's why the new investigations over CIA abuses are making the headlines. The President's out of Washington and something else needs to fill the media vacuum.

Well, there's a few problems with the new "investigation."
1. Since they were legally authorized, the actions of the CIA are, and were, considered legal.
2. All of the issues relating to these incidents have been over for at least five years.
3. The President promised not to do this.
4. The techniques were only used on three terrorists, and were not systematic.
5. George W. Bush isn't President anymore.

These "enhanced interrogation" techniques are and were wrong, but I'm not going to cry if Khalid Sheik Mohammed was told that his kids would be killed if 10,000 more Americans died. I'm more concerned with the prospect of al Qaeda massacring civilians than a lie told to the guy who plotted the September 11th atrocities.

Another problem with the investigation is that much of the information is not based from CIA, FBI, or Washington sources. Much of it is from testimony of al Qaeda murderers. Keep in mind that Saddam Hussein also claimed that he was tortured, while the guy was chowing down on Doritos.

So what's next. A couple of things. But let me tell you that one of them is that this investigation will not go anywhere. This is not a serious attempt to bring former Bush officials "to justice." This is just an attempt to get the media to focus on something other than the current President right now and hope that pop culture can re-foster that "Obama is awesome" message.

Another thing that will happen is that the investigations will polarize Americans. A majority of people don't support this action, and will leave Republicans angry. Now, that doesn't matter compared to who else it'll piss off: independents. Independents, especially conservative and libertarian ones, may have voted for Obama because of his "transcendent" message. Now these same voters see Obama not healing divisions, but exploiting them.

The President and his staff must think that they're pulling a fast one, but if the President and Rahm Emanuel would spend less time pulling it and more time plotting how to help our country, we'd be in a world of awesome.

Remember to bookmark our site!
Consider advertising on our site!

US Considering Dropping Charges Against bin Laden

Conservative News and Reporting
"News for the Rest of Us."
Geoffrey Likeson

According to sources in the Justice Department, the Obama Administration is pushing for the reversal of charges levied against purported al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden. Bin Laden is under indictment from U.S. courts for his roles in the bombings of American embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998, as well as the September 11, 2001 attacks.

This move comes as new Attorney General Eric Holder is promising a more "fair and open" Justice Department. Holder is the first African-American Attorney General and is a close confidant of the President.

According to a draft report circulating at the DOJ, Holder has asked that the charges against bin Laden and deputy Ayman al-Zawahiri be "suspended" until the time of their capture or death. Effectively, this would drop all charges against the two.

It is unknown if the President himself has pushed for these changes, but it is noted that such a public reversal could not happen without the White House's explicit approval.

The cause for this change of policy is not clear, but aligns closely with the changes that the Obama Administration has taken to reverse Bush-era "mistakes." It is speculated that the changes could be used to lessen international disapproval of American actions in Afghanistan. In addition, this could lead to a permanent suspension of the charges if bin Laden were to promise not to engage in terrorism.

It has been argued that if the charges are dropped against the al Qaeda members, then the United States technically has no right to apprehend or harm the two if they were ever found. James Fortright, a Constitutional scholar at George Washington University states that as long as there is no warrant for an arrest, the government is almost powerless.

"Without a warrant, you have to catch them in the act." Fortright stated in an email interview, "This would mean that if we located them, we could not touch them until a terrorist attack was already underway."

These changes are under the jurisdiction of the White House once approved by the Attorney General. When these actions will take place is unknown, but will likely be done by the end of the year.

Also, if you need to search anything on Google, please use the bar below:

Step One in the Effort to Limit Guns

Well, it's begun. We finally got our right to own assault weapons back thanks to President Bush in 2004 and now it looks like that's about to end. Perhaps the next step will be the banning of handguns or guns to the elderly.

President Obama is looking to reinstate the assault weapons ban, which could be seen as one step towards the limitation of private gun ownership. Unfortunately, it appears that these plans could easily go through Congress within the next year.

In the article, one of the defenses of this new policy is that it would reduce crime in Mexico. However, it stands to reason that the vast majority of assault weapons used by Mexican drug cartels are not bought legally. In addition, how many could come from the United States when it is entirely possible that they could get stockpiles of AK-47s from former Latin American hotspots like Colombia, El Salvador, and Nicaragua.

In addition, Americans on the southern border who are armed are better able to defend themselves if problems arise. In addition, if we actually got the southern border fence completed, we wouldn't have to worry as much about the Cartels.

In any case, the arming of a population is one of the greatest checks against tyranny. Stalin and Hitler both restricted gun ownership in some of their earliest acts. While I don't think that our government is doing this, it could be used as precedence fifty years from now to ban all firearms.

So if you were thinking about purchasing an AK or an AR-15, I'd say go do it today. Who knows when hunting rifles will be the next ban by an overzealous government.

So write your Congressmen and Senators and let them know that this is one step that we are not willing to take.

The Second Amendment is one of the most important portions of the Constitution. Maybe we should all remember that.

Also, if you need to search anything on Google, please use the bar below:

Million gunowners march, gaining strength.

Several months ago, I wrote an article on the increasing support spreading through out the entire Internet, calling for a million gunowners march, for us pro-second amendment Patriots to send a loud and clear message to Washington D.C.

Two months later.

The most anti-second amendment President of the United States is in office. The most anti-second amendment Attorney General, is in office. Anti-gun legislation has been proposed in both states and federal legislatures, luckily - all have been defeated to this point, in fact pro-gun legislation is winning across the United States.

Still, there are those of us who want a large demonstration of fellow pro-second amendment Americans to march on Washington D.C., just to show these anti-gunners we are here, and in large numbers.

Obviously someone agrees with that viewpoint, as an group has been launched on the Internet, to start gaining American support for a march on Washington next spring, much to the pleasure of myself and fellow pro-second amendment Conservatives.

www.secondamendmentmarch.com

The movement has gained the support of thousands in a short amount of time, it also appears the organizers are in communication with pro-second amendment activist, and rockstar Ted Nugent, all though nothing has been agreed to as of this afternoon, the presence of Mr.Nugent along would skyrocket attendance and support.

While I cannot personally guarantee I would participate in the direct marching, I can assure fellow Conservatives I am 100% in favor of this movement to finally show ourselves in large numbers and principle to the leftist anti-second amendment 111th United States Congress.

I call on all able bodied Conservatives to visit the second amendment website, and help in any which way you can. Whether it be in direct march, or in morale support of some sort. As, we need to finally stand up for what is right, our precious right to bear arms, as protected by the United States Constitution.

To freedom fellow Patriots!

Also, if you need to search anything on Google, please use the bar below:

No Eric Holder.

Eric Holder for Attorney General?

I don't think so.

This man has a miserable past, in the Clinton administration he was a key player in the pardon of Marc Rich, and was severely pro-gun control during those years, since he has supported every single anti-second amendment, anti-freedom, anti-Constitution, pro-gun control measure across the United States of America, and even wrote a letter to the United States Supreme Court stating that we as United States residents have no right to own guns, only state/federal militas do, if I may :

"a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

The Constitution clearly states that we as the people of the United States of America have the right to own firearms, and that this given right shall not be taken away from us.

Eric Holder is bad for this country, bad for our Constitution, and bad for gun owners.

As a member of the National Rifle Association, I hope the United States Senate blocks his nomination, and that the NRA fight this nomination to the end, we cannot let this man become Attorney General!


Also, if you need to search anything on Google, please use the bar below: