President Obama Sides With Ground Zero mosque.

President Barack Obama announced his support for the Ground Zero mosque yesterday evening during a White House event observing Ramadan. This comes just after a Fox News poll was released yesterday that found 64% of American voters think building a mosque near Ground Zero is just wrong.

Can anyone say tone deaf?

Not only is President Obama siding against an overwhelming majority of American voters on this subject (a subject bound to be heard from again in 2012), but he is also standing against the 9/11 victims and their families, and with the religion that caused 3,000 innocents to lose their lives on the worst attack against America since Pearl Harbor.

I don't know about you, but this Administration just keeps getting worse and worse and worse. I cannot believe that Obama would stand against 64% of the public because of "religious freedom" or religion at all. His stand is based on his radical ideology of appeasement and surrender, I have and you have seen this time and time again, but I don't think anyone ever expected it to reach such a level of pure insanity.

This mosque has nothing to do with religion, but with recognition.

Recognition of Islamic superiority over the West.

That's what Obama has signed up for; what our Soldiers signed up against.

Consider advertising on our site!

BREAKING: Suicide Bombers Strike Russia

From FoxNews:

MOSCOW -- Two female homicide bombers blew themselves up on Moscow's subway system as it was jam-packed with rush-hour passengers Monday, killing at least 35 people and wounding more than 30, the city's mayor and other officials said.

Emergency Ministry spokeswoman Svetlana Chumikova said 23 people were killed at the Lubyanka station in central Moscow. The station is underneath the building that houses the main offices of the Federal Security Service, or FSB, the KGB's main successor agency.

A second explosion hit the Park Kultury station about 45 minutes later. Chumikova said at least 12 were dead there.

Moscow Mayor Yuri Luzhkov said both explosions were believed to have been set off by female suicide bombers as the trains entered the stations. In the first case, officials said the explosion was on the train; there was no immediate information on the location of the second blast.

"The first data that the FSB has given us is that there were two female suicide bombers," Luzhkov told reporters at the Park Kultury site.

Russia's top investigative body also said terrorism was suspected.

The last confirmed terrorist attack in Moscow was in August 2004, when a suicide bomber blew herself up outside a city subway station, killing 10 people.

Responsibility for that blast was claimed by Chechen rebels and suspicion in Monday's explosions is likely to focus on them and other separatist groups in the restive North Caucasus region.

The Moscow subway system is one of the world's busiest, carrying around 7 million passengers on an average workday, and is a key element in running the sprawling and traffic-choked city.

The blasts practically paralyzed movement in the city center as emergency vehicles sped to the stations. Helicopters hovered over the Park Kultury station area, which is near the renowned Gorky Park.

Passengers, many of them in tears, streamed out of the station, one man exclaiming over and over "This is how we live!"

At least a dozen ambulances were on the scene.

Bookmark our site!

Consider advertising on our site!

United States Congress : give our sailors guns!

Yesterday Somali pirates/terrorists attacked an United States flag bearing ship nearing the coast of the troubled nation, the American crew fought back and took back the ship, but the Captain is still being held hostage for ransom. This is the second time this week, I ask the question, "what if these crewmen had a couple dozen of guns to prevent the attack in the first place?".

What if these brave American crewmen had two dozen guns containing Pistols, Shotguns, Rifles, AK 47'S, and boxes of ammo to protect themselves from the increasingly dangerous seas around the world. Right now, gun rights for sailors, are limited to various countries laws, and what the captain of the ship overall allows - most of the time, no guns are allowed on ship.

This policy must change.

I propose the following to the United States Congress, an act that would require that all American vessels have atleast a dozen working guns and ammo, this includes merchant ships, cargo ships, cruise chips - to defend themselves from pirates/terrorists, and to be allowed to have these firearms in any nationals territorial waters. All ships bearing the American flag, are subject only to American law - thus if American law demands all vessels be armed, anti-gun governments shall have no authority to say otherwise.

American interests, over International law.

Somali is a Nation of pirates, terrorists, a poor economy, and uncertainty. It is a breeding ground for terrorism, and are attacking ships constantly - this was the first attack on an American ship, the first since the early 1800's with the Barbary pirates, we send them a strong deadly message as Thomas Jefferson did 200 years ago, we will not tolerate terrorism.

But while idiots like Obama discuss the next move, Congress should insure this never happens again to an American ship, without a deadly fight at the least.

In summary, we are at war with these terrorists that the media calls pirates, they are no different then the evil we are fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq, and they attacked Americans - we must act now to defeat these cowards pronto. We must also move to arm our sailors for self defense, wherever in the world they may be.

Is my proposal radical?

No.

It is just common sense.

Since all United States vessels are under American law, and the second amendment guarantees the right of all citizens to own and bear arms, why should our sailors be any different?

Especially with self defense against terrorist

Consider advertising on our site!
Also, if you need to search anything on Google, please use the bar below:

Obama "Ends the War on Terror"

The Washington Post is reporting that the new President has ended the War Against Terrorism. This comes as the United States has significantly curtailed terrorism around the world and has prevented an attack on the U.S.

This is not why the war is ending. It's ending because we've done too much. We've been too successful, and too unilateral. The Post, which appears to support the actions, summed it up perfectly:

President Obama yesterday eliminated the most controversial tools employed by his predecessor against terrorism suspects. With the stroke of his pen, he effectively declared an end to the "war on terror," as President George W. Bush had defined it, signaling to the world that the reach of the U.S. government in battling its enemies will not be limitless.

And the world includes the terrorists and dictators.

Terrorists Hit by Plague

Some awesome news for those in need of some. Apparently al Qaeda in Algeria has been hit by our very old friend, the bubonic plague:

The victim belonged to the large al-Qaeda network AQLIM (al-Qaeda in the Land of the Islamic Maghreb).

A security source told the paper: "This is the deadliest weapon yet in the war against terror. Most of the terrorists do not have the basic medical supplies needed to treat the disease.

"It spreads It spreads quickly and kills within hours. This will be really worrying al-Qaeda."

and to make us feel better:

The group now fears the highly-infectious disease could have spread to other al-Qaeda training camps or Taliban fighters in Afghanistan, the paper said.

A source said: "The emirs (leaders) fear surviving terrorists will surrender to escape a horrible death."

Oh yeah. Maybe this'll slow them down.

Pakistan Offers "Joint Investigation"

Today, Pakistan offered a "joint investigation" into the Mumbai attacks. However, Pakistan is demanding that India show proof that the terrorists that struck Mumbai "were Pakistanis" before he would "arrest and extradite the list of terror suspects."

For India and Pakistan, it is a start. India must show it's resolve in hunting down terrorist scum by showing Pakistan proof that the terrorists were Pakistani. Pakistan, in turn, must help India track them down and send them to India.

It seems like progress is being made between the two countries, and I pray that progress continues.

Can Someone Explain This to Me? Part 3

What in the...Why is Sen. Obama planning to ban domestic drilling for oil? How does that even start to make sense?

Let's see, if we do drill, we will get oil from our own lands, lower our dependency on foreign oil (and in effect give less money to terrorists), bridge the gap until new technology is feasible, lower oil prices (because of an increase in supply), create new jobs, and help our economy.

If we don't, we will continue to buy more oil from overseas, oil prices will increase (less supply, more demand), and we will further be dependent on foreign nations.

I don't even see it can make sense not to drill. Please, how does this make sense in the least?