Showing posts with label United States Senate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label United States Senate. Show all posts

Saturday, September 4, 2010

Castle vs. O'Donnell - It's about GOP control.

What do you know about Delaware? Probably not much. It was originally settled by the Dutch, then the Swedish, and it was eventually forced into submission by the English, who in turn sold it to William Penn. It would later become the first State to support the United States Constitution, and later on was only one of a handful of slave states to remain in the Union.

Quite interesting, eh? I bet most Americans didn't know that much about Delaware, which is why it's so interesting that nearly every Conservative blog, website, and radio show is following the race of the day: Delaware's GOP Senatorial Primary between Michael Castle and Christine O'Donnell.

Michael Castle is the Republican Liberal in Congress, while Christine O'Donnell is the two-time failed Conservative Republican in Delaware. It pains me to write that, but what's true is what's true. Conservatives cannot select either candidate based on their votes or positions, but on which candidate can win in November and help Republicans regain control of the US Senate next January.

Michael Castle has won statewide elected office ten times without problem, and he's a sure vote for Senator Mitch McConnell to be the Senate Majority Leader in 2011. Christine O'Donnell has lost in Delaware twice before, once as a write-in candidate after she lost the Republican Nomination to face-off against Tom Carper in 2006, and again to Joe Biden in 2008 by 29 points as the Republican Nominee.

Republicans have a chance to regain control of the US Senate, and in order to do that we need Michael Castle to be our Nominee in Delaware...He's the only Republican that can defeat Democrat Chris Coons in November of this year or next year. That's a shame, but no other Republican (Conservative or Liberal) has won statewide office in Delaware, besides for Michael Castle since the early 1990's (excluding the State Auditor, Tom Wagner).

Tell me, who should we support: Castle or O'Donnell?

The answer is simple: Michael Castle for United States Senate.

Castle has won statewide office 13 times, 10 as Congressman.

Subscribe

Bookmark and Share

Consider advertising on our site!

Saturday, August 21, 2010

Rossi leads Murray in Washington by 7%.

WOW:

Dino Rossi (R) - 52%.
Pat Murray (D) - 45%.
Undecided voters - 3%.

* Denotes Incumbent

I knew that Washington's Primary results on Tuesday meant Mr.Rossi was on the correct path, but I didn't know he was actually on a winning path this early in the general election. 90% of all Republican voters support his campaign, along with about 60% of Independents - that is simply amazing to see in a state like Washington. We have to remember that Rossi virtually won the Governor's race in 2004 and still has a high level of support and credibility in this Pacific Northwest state.

Check out all of our recent
polling analysis including Arkansas Incumbent Dem Blanche Lincoln down 38%.

Defeating Senator Murray is no longer a question of maybe, but by how much. Especially when you consider that her campaign is trailing to Dino Rossi among voters aged 18-49, a crucial bloc of votes in a state where 52% of voters are under the age of 50. Also, Mr.Rossi leads both voters who have graduated college (51%), and who have not graduated from college (49%).

RELATED: Our expose on
Obama's State Senate records!

Thoughts?

Note - 51% of Washington voters are college graduates, while 49% are not. Sorry if any confusion came from my initial post.


Subscribe

Bookmark and Share

Consider advertising on our site!

Monday, August 16, 2010

Senator Levin Assaulted With a Pie.

I cannot believe that this has happened in America.

Senator Carl Levin had an apple pie thrown in his face this morning while talking to Democrats in a Mecosta County, Michigan deli. The reason? He's a defender of Israel, and he doesn't vote 99% of the time down the liberal foreign policy line. Of course my reaction is: And..........throwing a pie at a United States Senator is your only available response?

For some reason this incident is insulting to me. Whether a US Senator be Republican or Democrat; Conservative or Liberal, that individual deserves a certain amount of respect, and what happened in Michigan this morning broke the barrier between respectful disagreement with an elected official, and downright disrespectful intolerance.

Thoughts?

Subscribe

Bookmark and Share

Consider advertising on our site!

Monday, August 9, 2010

Complete 2010 Senate Rankings - August of 2010.

The November elections are now just 12 weeks away, and with that little time separating voters from a frustrating summer to a jubilant ballot box, the polls are burning every minute of the day and there's too much news to comprehend. However, we can all agree on one thing - Democrats have the most to lose, especially in the United States Senate.

The voters will be electing 37 Senator's in November, 19 of those seats are Democrat controlled and 18 are Republican controlled as of this August morning, but that will all change in just a few more weeks. In fact, I have been reading the polls and digesting the primaries, and I feel that I have a good pulse of the upcoming elections, thus I** offer the following 2010 US Senate rankings with extreme prejudice.

These rankings are based on solid Senate seats (100% sure to go Republican or Democrat), leaning Senate seats (75% sure to go either Republican or Democrat, pending on which way the political winds are blowing), and toss up Senate seats (pure political unknowns; grab a bag of popcorn and enjoy).

Solid Democratic seats - 7

Connecticut - Open seat (D).
Hawaii - Senator Inouye (D).
Maryland - Senator Mikulski (D).
New York 1 - Senator Schumer (D).
Oregon - Senator Wyden (D).
Vermont - Senator Leahy (D).
West Viringia - Open seat (D).

Leaning Democratic seats - 5

California - Senator Boxer (D).
Colorado - Senator Bennet (D).
Nevada - Senator Reid (D)*.
New York 2 - Senator Gillibrand (D).
Washington - Senator Murray (D).

Toss us seats - 6

Florida - Open seat (R).
Illinois - Open seat (D).
Missouri - Open seat (R).
Ohio - Open seat (R).
Pennsylvania - Open seat (D).
Wisconsin - Senator Feingold (D).

Leaning Republican seats - 6

Alaska - Senator Murkowski (R).
Delaware - Open seat (D).
Indiana - Open seat (D).
Kentucky - Open seat (R).
New Hampshire - Open seat (R).
North Carolina - Senator Burr (R).

Solid Republican seats - 13

Alabama - Senator Shelby (R).
Arkansas - Senator Lincoln (D).

Arizona - Senator McCain (R).
Georgia - Senator Isakson (R).
Idaho - Senator Crapo (R).
Iowa - Senator Grassley (R).
Kansas - Open seat (R).
Louisiana - Senator Vitter (R).
North Dakota - Open seat (D).
Oklahoma - Senator Coburn (R).
South Carolina - Senator DeMint (R).
South Dakota - Senator Thune (R).
Utah - Open seat (R).

As it stands........

Senate Democrats will retain 12 seats, and lose 4 seats.
Senate Republicans will retain 15 seats, and gain 4 seats.
6 Senate seats are undecided - 3 Democrat, 3 Republican.

* - Reid has taken a lead in the polls, though Angle can reverse it.
** - I do apologize for the excessive use of "I" in the second paragraph.

Subscribe

Bookmark and Share

Consider advertising on our site!

Thursday, August 5, 2010

Republican Roll Call on Elena Kagan Nomination.

Elena Kagan has officially been confirmed as the 112th United States Supreme Court Justice and I am pleased to report that close to 90% of our Republican Senator's opposed her Nomination, which is something special when you take into account the lack of judicial filibuster's or even opposition by Republicans in a historical or present sense to Supreme Court Nominee's.

Here's the Senate Republican Roll Call on Elena Kagan:

Senator Alexander - Nay.
Senator Barrasso - Nay.
Senator Bennett - Nay.
Senator Kit Bond - Nay.
Senator Brown - Nay.
Senator Brownback - Nay.
Senator Bunning - Nay.
Senator Burr - Nay.
Senator Chambliss - Nay.
Senator Coburn - Nay.
Senator Cochran - Nay.
Senator Collins - Yea.
Senator Corker - Nay.
Senator Cornyn - Nay.
Senator Crapo - Nay.
Senator DeMint - Nay.
Senator Ensign - Nay.
Senator Enzi - Nay.
Senator Graham - Yea.
Senator Grassley - Nay.
Senator Gregg - Yea.
Senator Hatch - Nay.
Senator Hutchison - Nay.
Senator Inhofe - Nay.
Senator Isakson - Nay.
Senator Johanns - Nay.
Senator Jon Kyl - Nay.
Senator LeMieux - Nay.
Senator Lugar - Yea.
Senator McCain - Nay.
Senator McConnell - Nay.
Senator Murkowski - Nay.
Senator Risch - Nay.
Senator Roberts - Nay.
Senator Sessions - Nay.
Senator Shelby - Nay.
Senator Snowe - Yea.
Senator Thune - Nay.
Senator Vitter - Nay.
Senator Voinovich - Nay.
Senator Wicker - Nay.

36 Republicans voted no, only 5 Republicans voted yes. And if you remember as I do, close to a dozen Republicans supported Sonia Sotomayor last summer, while a majority (29) opposed, and I have just one more thing to note on this subject: Senator Nelson was the only Democrat to oppose Kagan.

Any thoughts as to how our Republican dissidents should be handled?

Subscribe

Bookmark and Share
Consider advertising on our site!

Tuesday, August 3, 2010

Hayworth trails Democrat opponent in Arizona.

Supporters of Senator John McCain often tout his fiscal discipline, his record on National Defense and our Troops, and his common Conservatism that has led to a 81% rating from the ACU. But, I have a feeling that McCainiacs will soon be adding Only McCain Can Win Arizona in their touted reasons.

According to a new poll from Ramussen Reports, Senator John McCain is leading his potential Democratic opponent by close to 20%. However, McCain's Republican foe, JD Hayworth, trails their common Democratic opponent by 5%, and close to 30% of pro-McCain voters obviously will not support Hayworth if he is the eventual Republican Nominee (at least for now).

Rasmussen Reports Survey of 500 Likely Voters:



Sen. John McCain (R) - 53%.
Rodney Glassman (D) - 34%.
Some other candidate - 11%.
Not Sure - 3%.

Rodney Glassman (D) - 43%.
Rep. JD Hayworth (R) - 38%.
Some other candidate - 13%.
Not Sure - 6%.

This poll is shocking. I have always figured that if Hayworth were to beat McCain, that at least the Senate seat would remain in Republican hands and that we would have a National Defense supporter oncemore. That last part now means nothing, because Hayworth cannot win, McCain can, and only McCain will.

What's your choice: Victory or Defeat?

Subscribe
Bookmark and Share
Consider advertising on our site!

Friday, July 23, 2010

All together now: Bush was right.

When future historians review the Presidential record of George W. Bush, his push for across the board tax cuts will be well received and praised for spurring substantial economic growth during most of his two terms. However, it appears the Bush Tax Cuts, which are set to expire at the end of this year, might be extended by the Democratic controlled Congress.

Yes, you did read that right. Several Democratic Senators and Congressmen are calling on both Houses of Congress to once again extend the Bush Tax Cuts, and their position received a major endorsement this morning - from Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke. It seems some are starting to get it.

It's true that the Bush Tax Cuts would have one hell of a legislative hill to climb, but that isn't unusual for these Tax Cuts, which barely passed the Senate back in 2003, even though Republicans had a slight majority (3 Republicans voted no, 2 Democrats voted yes, and Cheney broke the 50-50 tie).

Could the Tax Cuts be extended? Probably not. Here's why:

1. Speaker Pelosi opposes them, and unless their added onto some other piece of legislation via an amendment (which would require the support of 50% plus 1 of the House), nothing will happen in the House, unless her hand is forced.

2. 44 Senators support them now, but we would need 51 Senator's at the least if the vote does come, which I see as near impossible.

3. President Obama has to sign off on them. And unless he is visited by the ghost of Reagan, and the actual presence of Bush bashing him over the head, I suspect he would wield his Presidential veto power.

If the Bush Tax Cuts are extended, it's possible the Great Recession will not be as horrific as we previously thought, but that's a big if, because the Tax Cuts actually have to be extended, which will probably never happen, even though the list of Democrats supporting them increases each and every day.

Subscribe

Bookmark and Share

Consider advertising on our site!

Monday, July 19, 2010

How many Republican Senators will oppose Kagan?

With the Senate Judicial Committee voting on the President's second Nominee to the United States Supreme Court, current Solicitor General Elena Kagan this week, and with the entire US Senate voting on her Nomination within the next few weeks, I feel it's necessary to rollcall/guess how many of our Senator's will oppose Ms.Kagan.

Let us start with these statistics:

72.5% of the Senate Republican Conference opposed the Nomination of Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court last summer. 11 Republicans supported her.

77.5% of the Senate Republican Conference opposed the Nomination of Elena Kagan to become the Solicitor General last spring. 6 Republicans supported her.

We already know that Ms.Kagan will receive more opposition from Republicans than Sotomayor did last summer, on account of her opposition to Military recruiters on campus, her stonewalling of US Senators, and the fact she is far more liberal than anyone anticipated. However, the expected opposition cannot be determined accurately.

Why?

1. Senator's Cochran, Ensign, and Graham were not present during the entire Solicitor General Senate vote in March of last year.

2. Senator's Coburn, Hatch, and Kyl supported Kagan's nomination for Solicitor General, but we know Hatch opposes her Nomination to the Supreme Court, leaving more speculation in the air as to who could flip one way or another.

3. Senator Martinez is no longer apart of the Senate (he voted against Kagan), as he resigned and was replaced by Senator LeMieux, who just happens to have no record whatsoever on Kagan.

At the least we should be able to expect 35 or 36 Republican Senator's to oppose Elena Kagan's nomination to the Bench, with the entire Democratic Caucus supporting her. That's just a guess on my part, but we'll find out soon enough.

Thoughts?

Subscribe

Bookmark and Share
Consider advertising on our site!

Friday, June 11, 2010

The Murkowski Resoluton fails 47-53.

Senator Murkowski's Joint Resolution in opposition to the Environmental Protection Agency's "carbon is pollution" ruling failed last evening with 47 Senators supporting the Resolution, and with 53 Senators opposing the Resolution; closer than expected. We shouldn't be surprised that the Resolution failed; but that it failed by only a few votes.

While opposition to the Resolution was strictly partisan; a coalition of 41 Republicans and 6 Democrats united in support of this Resolution; united in opposition against the greenhouse gas hysteria; and united in opposition against the seizure of more legislative authority by the executive branch. I believe those 6 Democratic Senators deserve a little recognition for bucking the President:

Senator Bayh of Indiana. Senator Landrieu of Louisiana. Senator Lincoln of Arkansas. Senator Nelson of Nebraska. Senator Pryor of Arkansas. Senator Rockefeller of West Virginia. It's true that Senator Webb of Virginia also agreed with the principle behind the Resolution; but that he did not want to condemn Executive Branch programs that have done some good.

While I was reviewing the Roll Call Vote yesterday evening; a couple of "nay votes" caught my attention: Senator Begich of Alaska opposed the Resolution, not a smart vote for someone who wants to be reelected in 4 years in the oil capital of America; and Senator Byrd of West Virginia also opposed the Resolution, which is quite interesting - considering his announced opposition to a cap and trade scheme.

We might have fallen a few votes short of what was required to pass the Resolution; but we have more than enough opposing votes to derail any cap and trade sceheme that is proposed in the US Senate through out the rest of the 111th United States Congress. There's always light at the end of the tunnel.

Bookmark our site!Subscribe
Bookmark and Share
Consider advertising on our site!

Friday, May 7, 2010

2010 Florida Senate Race: Crist lead will not last.

According to a recent Mason Dixon poll on the United States Senate race in Florida, Governor Crist has increased his support in Florida to 38%, while Marco Rubio has fallen to 32% and the lone admitted Democrat has tumbled to an embarrassing 19%.

Some believe the situation for the Democrat candidate can only get worse, as Florida Democrats will continue to flee his campaign and join Charlie Crist, as a Southern version of Joe Lieberman would be better than a younger, Cuban version of Ronald Reagan in their opinion.

It could very well work out that way, but I still believe Marco Rubio will receive 45% of the vote, Meeks will carry 43% of the vote, and Governor Crist will fall to 12% of the vote - unlikely to anyone reading the latest polls. However, we must remember Independent candidacies always perform well at first, but 90% Republicans will join Rubio, and Democrats will eventually rediscover their own candidate.

Charlie Crist is the perfect candidate at the perfect time for an Independent bid for Washington, being a popular Redstate Governor in a traditional Redstate. However, his support for the faulty Stimulus package will remove Independent voters from his column, Republicans who still stand by their man, will eventually flee his campaign as November approaches, and I just cannot see Democrats leaving their candidate to suffer the embarrassment of a third place finish to Marco Rubio and Charlie Crist, two right-of-center individuals.

Call me biased as a longtime Marco Rubio supporter, but his campaign has the momentum and energy of Conservative Floridians, and I just cannot see Charlie Crist's campaign of over-the-road Democrats and fence sitting Independents leading Crist to Paradise, or even Walt Disney for that matter.

Crist will fall, the only question is when.


Bookmark our site!Subscribe

Bookmark and Share

Consider advertising on our site!

Sunday, April 18, 2010

McConnell To Crist: Don't Do It

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has some strong words for Florida Governor Charlie Crist, who is considering running as an independent in Florida's Senate election this November.

We’re going to elect a Republican senator in Florida, and the Republican primary voters in Florida are going to determine who that is,” McConnell said on CNN’s “State of the Union. “We’ve been looking at the surveys, as you indicate, and it looks like Marco Rubio is running a very effective campaign and seems to have the lead. I’m going to be there behind the Republican nominee whoever that is.”

McConnell, who has supported Crist, said the governor would “lose all Republican support if he were to run as an independent.”



Well, maybe Crist will start getting the picture. Let's see what happens with the next batch of polls.

Bookmark our site!
Subscribe
Bookmark and Share
Consider advertising on our site!

Tuesday, February 16, 2010

The Hammer on Bayh's Retirement

Let's take a look at what Charles Krauthammer has to say:



Bookmark our site!
Subscribe
Bookmark and Share
Consider advertising on our site!

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

A GOP Senate?

Probably not, but hey, it's still fun to read about.

In order to win back the Senate, the GOP needs to win ten Senate seats. It's not impossible-- the Democrats won eight in 2008 and then had the good fortune of Arlen Specter switching parties. While not impossible, it is still very unlikely.

But we can all hope.

There's still a lot of factors open, but there are some we have to look at.

Advantage: GOP

1. In an off-year election, only die-hard voters tend to come out. Transient and voters who vote for Dems because it's en vogue are much less likely to cast ballots.

2. With 2009's deficit larger than all eight years of the Bush deficits, spending hawks (including many libertarians) will likely vote Republican.

3. Corruption scandals, such as Roland Burris, Rob Blagojevich, and Chris Dodd will push some, perhaps not most, ethics voters to the GOP.

4. Unemployment and the floundering economy will likely put much of the blame on President Obama's party.

5. The fact that the Democrats are in control will hurt their 'outsider' credibility.

6. The GOP is enthusiastic for the first time since 2004.

Disadvantage: GOP

1. The electorate is different than in 1994. The white and evangelical communities are smaller proportions of the US electorate than 16 years ago.

2. The 'blame Bush' card will still work among the young and urbanites.

3. Pop culture will drive out some (if not many) people who would not vote anyway. Expect a Jon Stewart/Hollywood/MTV-led drive to "Rock the Vote."

4. Sometimes people are just dumbasses.

Bookmark our site!
Subscribe
Bookmark and Share
Consider advertising on our site!

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Brown-Coakley Exit Polls, Election Results

Chime in on our election day Open Thread!

Jumping in Pools was one of the first blogs on the internet to call the 2009 New Jersey governor's race for Republican Chris Christie.

UPDATE: Coakley claims 'voter fraud.'

From all of the data from news sources, polls, and important pundits, we'd like to make the following estimates:

Scott Brown (R) 49.4%
Martha Coakley (D) 47.0%
Kennedy (L) 3.6%


We have word of heavy turnout in less-liberal areas of Massachusetts. There is also snowfall in far-left regions of the state.

Stay tuned to Jumping in Pools for election night coverage!

Bookmark our site!
Subscribe
Bookmark and Share
Consider advertising on our site!

Coakley Claiming "Voter Fraud" as Panic Sets In

Chime in on our election day Open Thread!

The Coakley campaign is in total damage control as a heavy turnout appears to be favoring her opponent, Scott Brown. With recent polls showing Brown ahead by nearly ten points, Coakley's campaign is now claiming that Brown is 'stealing' the election.

From her campaign site:

We've received several independent and disturbing reports of voters across the state being handed ballots that are already marked in favor of Scott Brown. This is obviously a serious violation, and our legal team is taking immediate steps to protect the integrity of this election.

We do not yet know why this is happening, but you and everyone you know needs to be aware of the situation so that you can carefully inspect your ballot. If a vote has already been marked, you must return the ballot to the elections official, demand a clean ballot, and call our Voter Protection Hotline at 617-351-6866.
Meanwhile, Scott Brown is reporting from his Twitter that Doug Flutie is campaigning in Park Plaza in Boston right now!

Doug Flutie is volunteering at the Park Plaza in Boston helping the team set up, what a great guy!
From Coakley's Twitter, one voter said that she was voting for a really important and valid reason.

if you haven't voted, please do. dems deserve a chance to fix 8 years of bush.
So that Coakleybot is right-- get out and vote for Scott.

Bookmark our site!
Subscribe
Bookmark and Share
Consider advertising on our site!

Monday, January 18, 2010

Vote in Our Poll: Who Will Win the MA Senate Race?



Bookmark our site!
Subscribe
Bookmark and Share
Consider advertising on our site!

A Look into the Final Internals in the MA Race-- Adjusted for Party ID

Everyone and their brother has been watching next Tuesday's special election in Massachusetts extremely closely. Common logic on the GOP side of the blogosphere thinks that Scott Brown might pull it off but the Dems are hoping to drag Martha Coakley over the finish line.

So let's take a look at the 2010 polls and party identification, as well as the 2008 Presidential race.

2008

In 2008, Barack Obama carried the state 61.8-36.0%. According to final polling data in the state before the election, Obama was winning 56-36%, a 20% margin. Between the final polling and the actual vote, 6% of the population swung into Obama's corner. While many of these voters likely leaned Obama anyway, McCain's polls equaled his statewide totals. Part of what may have caused the flux were younger, less informed voters, casting a ballot for Obama due to his perceived popularity.

The other statewide race was the Senate race between incumbent Senator John Kerry and virtual unknown Jeff Beatty. In this race, Kerry won 65.8-31.0%. The final polling numbers had Kerry ahead 65-30%, showing little sway between the voters. Likely, many of these voters were more familiar with Massachusetts politics and were not swayed due to Obama being at the top of the ballot.

2010

Now, let's talk about today. We've got this upcoming race with Scott Brown winning in most polls. However, we have to match it with Massachusetts party ids.

37% are Democrats
11% are Republicans
52% are independents

Rasmussen's polling has a sample including 52% of Democrats, 15% higher than the actual results. What is likely to happen is that if Brown's large advantage among Independents comes through here are the results:

According to an ARG poll, Brown leads 94-1% among Republicans, 58-37% among independents and is losing 71-20% among Democrats. To use JUST these numbers, and not accounting for fervor, we get the following results:

7.4% of the total electorate are Democrats for Brown.
26.3% are Dems for Coakley.
10.3% are Republicans for Brown.
0.01% are Republicans for Coakley
30.2% are Independents for Brown.
19.2% are Independents for Coakley.

Not counting in the undecideds, to add up the numbers, Brown leads with 47.9% and Coakley has 45.5%. These numbers don't factor in a third-party candidate, but I do believe that these will likely coincide with the actual results. With Obama 'firing up' the young and more ignorant voters, they are more likely to come out to vote against the perennial bogeyman 'Bush.'

But it still leaves Brown up by 2.4%.

Bookmark our site!
Subscribe
Bookmark and Share
Consider advertising on our site!

Sunday, January 17, 2010

Audio of Coakley Calling Schilling a 'Yankee Fan'

Behold the audio from Martha Coakley calling Curt Schilling a Yankee fan.

No wonder she's going to lose:



Bookmark our site!
Subscribe
Bookmark and Share
Consider advertising on our site!

Wednesday, January 6, 2010

Vote in Our Poll: How Many Senate Seats Will the Republicans Win in 2010?



Bookmark our site!
Subscribe
Bookmark and Share
Consider advertising on our site!

Sunday, November 22, 2009

Who's Most Likely to Vote Against the Health Care Bill

In looking at the voting records and personal feelings of some of the Democrats in the Senate, it can be shown that the following are most likely to vote against the health care plan. Many of these have different reasons, but they could hold the key (or the lock) to passing the bill.

Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-LA)

Already has over $100 million in the bill for state funding in her pocket for voting yes. While this may certainly seem attractive, it could also be seen as back-door corruption. If the issue gets hot enough, she might have to back off or be seen as a pork guzzler.

Sen. Ben Nelson (D-NE)

Nelson is from one of the reddest states in the Union, and while well-liked, he could be facing a large backlash for his vote. Not only this, he could ruin the chances for other Democrats seeking Nebraska office. Nelson has already stated that he is against a public option being run by the feds and wants to see it done by the states. His pro-life stance could also cause him to vote against a bill which could pay for abortions. Nelson even said: "I don't want a big-government, Washington-run operation that would undermine the ... private insurance that 200 million Americans now have,"

Sen. Evan Bayh (D-IN)

Bayh is a moderate from a state which gave George W. Bush 60% in 2004. Even though President Obama narrowly won the state last year, the fading of Obamamania and smaller turnout could destroy other Dems. Bayh voted for debate, but has expressed doubt about the bill.

Blanche Lincoln (D-AR)

A formerly relatively unknown Senator from Arkansas she faces an uphill battle no matter what she does. She's already seeing opponents nearly tying her, while polls suggest that if she votes yes on the bill, she might as well retire. She has also threatened a filibuster against the bill despite voting to debate.

Bernie Sanders (Socialist-VT)

One of only two independents in the Senate, you might be surprised to see Sanders' name. However, the Vermont Socialist has stated that he would vote down a health care bill that did not include the public option. He has also stated that his support for the bill is "in no ways guaranteed."

Sherrod Brown (D-OH)

Brown, elected in the Democratic wave of 2006, is giving similar warnings as Sanders. Brown, whose term is not up next year, is worried that the Democrats have already given up enough to the Republicans and moderate Democrats.

Olympia Snowe (R-ME)

One of the two liberal Republicans elected to the Senate from Maine, Snowe has signaled that she will likely vote for President Obama's health care plan. There have been signs, however, that conservatives in the party want to challenge the Senator-- and voting yes could cause this to happen. This could even create a situation where Snowe changes parties.

Joe Lieberman (I-CT)

The Independent Democrat has bucked the party's trends since 2002, and looks like he might be voting against the bill. Lieberman, who might not run for reelection in 2012, may not care if the left wing of his party challenged him again. Lieberman has also stated that he opposes a public option. Fearing an increasing deficit, Lieberman may vote no.

Susan Collins (R-ME)

Collins appears to have no major qualms with the substance of the bill, but may wind up voting no because the bill as presented may not lower overall medical costs.

My prediction:

All of these Senators, with the exception of Lieberman and Nelson will likely vote yes. Even Lincoln appears to please the party apparatus and looks unlikely to win in 2010 anyway.

Bookmark our site!
Subscribe
Bookmark and Share
Consider advertising on our site!